Sent via BlackBerry from T-Mobile
Friday, April 30, 2010
SB1070 be some bullshit.
Here's hoping this one gets shot down hard and fast.
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/emma-rubysachs/legal-challenge-to-arizon_b_557678.html
Thursday, April 29, 2010
Thank God! Two bits of extremely good DCU news.
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2010/04/28/AR2010042805680.html
And we got a win! And Najar and Cristman are finally producing! Granted it is the US Open Cup, but any win at all can only help their confidence. We might even be able to make a run at the US Open Cup if we cant salvage our MLS season.
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2010/04/28/AR2010042806223.html
Tuesday, April 27, 2010
Jomarie is right!
Speak of the deviled
Sent via BlackBerry from T-Mobile
Thursday, April 22, 2010
Wednesday, April 21, 2010
Los que no salta
http://m.si.com/news/sp/to_soccer_sports/detail/2544533/full;jsessionid=3D8194523C95E96ADDDAFBF88515371D.cnnsi1b
I have no doubt that this is great news for American soccer fans. I believe that American TV networks are more than capable of manufacturing a market for televised soccer in America if they put their minds to it - and it sounds like that is exactly what they have done. Wonderful news for those of us who crave more TV coverage of international soccer!
However, I am not as convinced that this bodes well for MLS. Does expanded coverage of the major European leagues (ESPN is expanding to 85 Premiership games next year, and is making a play for Champions league games too) help the MLS by generating a greater buzz for the sport of soccer in a market that hasn't really warmed up to it yet, or does it hurt MLS by providing US soccer fans a more exciting option than watching DC United lose every game?
I recently read somewhere that some of the domestic leagues in Africa saw their game attendance plummet when they started getting live TV coverage of the Champions League.
What do you guys think?
Sent via BlackBerry from T-Mobile
Monday, April 19, 2010
Sunday, April 18, 2010
Vanity
Ideas? Suggestions?!
Save Money, Live Better.
Friday, April 16, 2010
To all my Excel fiends out there.
I am building a spreadsheet to track and project fuel consumption. The user inputs the fuel capacity of the ship, the last reported fuel percentage, and the number of days spent underway since the last report. The spreadsheet multiplies the days underway times a standard daily burn rate, subtracts that product from the last reported fuel levels and produces an estimate of the current fuel level. Pretty simple stuff, but very handy.
So while I was working on this I noticed that if I left the "days underway since last report" cell empty (to indicate that the ship hadn't gone anywhere), the spreadsheet was still telling me that I had burned a day's worth of fuel. And I was all like "wtf?"
The explanation I eventually came to was that in mathematical formulae, Excel treats an empty cell as a 1, not as a zero! Wtf?!
I am spooked.
(A) Why would it do that?
(B) Is there a setting somewhere where I can tell it to cut that shit out?
(C) If not, why not?!
Sent via BlackBerry from T-Mobile
Thursday, April 15, 2010
Whaaaaaaaaaaaaat?! Yet another reason to (maybe) be a complete Apple fanboy
It's awesome watching everyone fight to make a better product
http://news.cnet.com/8301-11128_3-10436851-54.html
Intel, Apple, GE, Whirlpool... pretty much everyone else jumped on this concept and I can't wait for something awesome to pop up. I guess I should probably be living in a home first, but still.
Friday, April 9, 2010
Say "be cool, bench!"
He has announced he will in fact be retiring this year.
www.thestreet.com/offers/omnisky/html/markets/marketfeatures/10722162.html
From the article:
"The leading candidates to replace Stevens are Solicitor General Elena Kagan, 49, and federal appellate judges Merrick Garland, 57, and Diane Wood, 59."
Out of curiosity I looked it up. Kagan and Garland are Jewish. Wood is Protestant.
Sent via BlackBerry from T-Mobile
Thursday, April 8, 2010
The most interesting commercial, I think, I have ever seen
The voice-over is a recording of his dead father.
Wednesday, April 7, 2010
Tell that bench to be cool.
But that's not what is interesting! The interesting thing is that Stevens happens to be the only Protestant currently on the bench. The court, it turns out, is overwhelmingly Catholic, and disproportionately Jewish. Since the court was founded by Hammurabi (or someone like that) in 1492 (give or take) , there have been a total of 12 Catholic supremes - 6 of them are currently serving on the court. There have been 7 total Jews, two of whom are currently on the bench. If Steven's replacement is not a Protestant, the court could be entirely without a Protestant for the first time since the Spanish Inquisition (or thereabouts.)
I did some quick wikipedia research and found that 51% of the country is Protestant, 23% Catholic and 1.7% Jewish. I also happen to know that nearly all of our Presidents have been Protestant, the single exception being President Kennedy. So why so few Protestants?
I don't point this out as a problem. The Supreme Court has no obligation to maintain any sort of representative sample of the American religious landscape. I point it out simply because it is a remarkable statistical anomaly.
I have a few possible explanations, but I am interested to hear yours. Anyone got a theory that might explain this?
Sent via BlackBerry from T-Mobile
Tuesday, April 6, 2010
Thursday, April 1, 2010
Indiana, and other stories.
It concerns the Indian railroad system. These numbers are vague, but I am quite sure they are accurate. I am sure a few minutes of research could produce more exact figures, but I liked the way this information was conveyed to me so I will pass it on to you unaltered.
A) If you were to pull up all the railroad tracks in India and lay them along the equator in one long single track, there would be enough of it to go around the world one-and-a-half times!
B) The railway system is all government-owned. The number of people employed by the government to run the railroad system is larger than the number of people in the US Military.
A couple of things immediately sprang to mind when I heard these numbers.
The first was a reaffirmation of my belief that there has never been, in the history of the world, a logistical enterprise to equal the British Empire. God only knows what horrible methods they used on the Indian population to construct this colossal web of railways, but there is a sort of morbid magnificence to the brutal efficiency of the world’s first capitalist empire.
The second was a sudden realization of the incredible weight of the Indian government bureaucracy. If they have that many people working for the railroad alone, how large must the government payroll be if you include the military and all the ministries? It must be gigantic.
In a related story*, it seems that Google has decided to change its name from Google to Topeka.
* I use the term "related" somewhat loosely. These two stories are related geographically because Indiana and Kansas are both corn-spangled Midwestern states, and temporally because I happened to become aware of them both within roughly the same time period.
In a totally unrelated story, I am very excited about this weekend. Twitter confirms.